Never noticed. Does it seem intentional at all?
The part when she is telling the story, the echo is definitely intentional. When the scene returns back to the car, the echo there has to be unintentional. After a line from each one, the echo goes away.
I believe that is the only "recollection" scene in TAGS? Any others?
I'll get you for this deputy.
How about when Any was telling Helen how he dropped of the fingerprint kit in the courthouse - 3 Wishes for Opie.
There was the time Andy told Hellen how Barney used Count Istvan Teleky (or however you spell it) to predict their upcoming wedding. I think most of that show was reaching back in the past.
I believe you're right about the episode being largely flashbacks, but not narrations, like the Hilda Mae one in 'Andy Saves Barney's Morale'. I know who was interfering with the echo effect....it was them bothersome brats that hang around my barn!! DOGGONE THEM!!
BARNEY: Andy, you can’t deliver a baby. Think back to Biology class.”
ANDY: What about it?
BARNEY: You FLUNKED!
Ever noticed in the episode: “Barney’s Replacement” that Barney resigned and walked out in his uniform, yet when he decided to withdraw his retirement, that Andy just happened to have Barney’s uniform hanging in the back room.
Very interesting, Colonel. Maybe Andy bought a backup set due to Barney’s frequent resignations.
There was someone in charge of continuity. This makes me crazy, all the mistakes. Such as Emma's last name was Watson in the bookie barber episode, yet Brand when Ellie came to town.
I have the opposite response...I think it makes the show more interesting. The continuity issues were due largely to them using one camera. Each angle change required changing the position of that one camera. You are correct that the continuity person must have been “somewhere’s else.”
I agree with you Larry...plus it makes it fun for us when we find the little inconsistencies.